Publications

Some Print and Online Media Featuring Our Partners

  • Cleantech Innovators Should be Aware of Certain Global Intellectual Property Issues, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, May 2010
  • 知识产权和清洁技术— 关键问题和需要做的决定 (Intellectual Property Rights And Clean Technology – Critical Issues And Decisions To Be Made), on Qianlong.com, March 18, 2010
  • Protecting Patent Holders of Clean Technology, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Feb. 12, 2010
  • Handotai Gyokai ni okeru Tokkyo-sosho oyobi Tokkyo-shinsa no Doko (The Trends of Patent Litigation and Protection in the Semiconductor Industry), Legal Updates US, Business Law Journal, July 2008
  • Small Claims Court: Getting More Bang for Fewer Bucks [Steven Rinehart] UTAH BAR J. 32, 33–34 (Sep. 4, 2010) (quoted by the Supreme Court in Allen v. Moyer, 2011 UT 44, 259 P.3d 1049), Full publication available here. Patent Trends in the Cleantech Industry, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, July 2008
  • Change of Conduct, Patent World, April 2008
  • Patent Litigation and Prosecution Trends in the Semiconductor Industry, IP Perspectives, Fall/Winter 2007
  • Patent Litigation has Doubled and Will Double Again Over the Next Decade, Electronic Design, November 2007
  • Expect Twofold Increase in Patent Litigation, Electronic Engineering Times, Sept. 2007
  • Patent Litigation on the Rise in Semiconductor Sector, Electronic Engineering Times, Sept. 2007
  • Accelerated Patent Examination for Nanotechnology and Emerging Technologies, IP Perspectives, Spring/Summer 2007
  • Risks and Rewards of Accelerated Examination:  New Procedures at the USPTO, Small Times, www.smalltimes.com, February 2007
  • New Procedures at the USPTO: The Risks and Rewards of Accelerated Patent Examination within 12 Months, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, January 2007
  • Patented Compounds Inherently Coproduced as Trace Impurities: Issues of Inherent Anticipation and Literal Infringement, 32 AIPLA Q.J. 425 (2004)
  • The “Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer” in Construing Patent Claims, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 931 (2004)
  • Inherent Anticipation:  The Downfall of Recognition, LAIPLA Bulletin, Issue 18, April 2004
  • What is a Markman Hearing? LAIPLA Bulletin, Issue 16, December/January 2004
  • Practical Tips on Enforcing and Defending Patents, 75 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 791 (2003)
  • Markman v. Westview:Juries and Patent Infringement Suits, 58 Ohio St. L.J. 271 (1997)
  • The Same Effect:  United States Provisional Patent Applications and Paris Convention Priority Rights, 37 J.L. TECH. 1; 78 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 734 (1996)
  • Inventions Made in U.S.A.:  Foreign “Equality” Under Applicable International Treaties, 587 IIC 27 (1996)
  • The International Suture: A Comparative Approach to Patenting Methods of Medical Treatment, 78 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 443 (1996)
  • Dane C. Butzer, Bradley D. Clymer and Betty Lise Anderson, A Highly Efficient Interconnection For Use With a Multistage Optical Switching Network, 34 Applied Optics 1788-1800 (1995)
  • The Public’s Right to Know? Or a Red-Tape Nightmare?:  Demanding Best Mode Disclosure to be Updated, 35 J.L. & Tech. 261 (1995)
  • Contributor to Applied Cryptography, Bruce Schneier, 1st Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 1994 (CD Appendix)
  • Motivation and Set-Size:  In re Bell Provides a Link Between Chemical and Biochemical Patent Claims, 2 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 89 (1993)